Potassium Hydroxide Refining of Cottonseed Oil

66th Annual Oil Mill Operator’s Short Course

April 20, 1998

Lab Testing

Basic Differences

Potassium Hydroxide vs. Sodium Hydroxide

· Molecular Weight 56 : 40

· Soap Density Higher

Heavier Soap

Better Separation

· Lower Reactivity on Triglycerides

Less Neutral Oil Loss

 

FULL SCALE TESTING

RESULTS FROM MARCH 18TH OSCEOLA PRODUCTS REFINING TRIAL #1

OIL LOSS CALCULATIONS

 

NAOH

KOH I

KOH 2

MEASUREMENTS:

     

REFINED OtL LBS (R)

76,328

75,807

75,008

WET CAUSTIC USED

7,034

8,285

3,489

CAUSTIC CONCENTRATION

19.6%

29.0%

28.6%

DRY CAUSTIC USED (D)

1,379

2,403

992

SOAP M&V(M)

57.5%

44.6%

48.4%

SOAP PERCENT CAUSTIC (S)

6.7%

11.1%

7.4%

       

CALCULATIONS:

     

SOAPSTOCK PRODUCED (SP) = D/S

20,577

21,645

13,407

CRUDE OIL IN SOAP (C)=[SP X (100-(M+S))]

7,367

9,589

5,926

REFINING LOSS = [C/(C+R) X 100

8.8

11.2

7.3

 

 

ANALYTICAL RESULTS BY BARROW-AGEE & JESSE COVEY

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS USING CRUDE COTTONSEED OIL

 

NAOH

KOH

SAVINGS

       

CRUDE % FFA

1.0%

1.0%

 

CRUDE REFINED (Million lbs)

1.0

1.0

 

% DRY CAUSTIC TREAT (based on excess)

1.65%

1.22%

 

DRY CAUSTIC USAGE (lbs/yr)

16,500

12,200

 

CAUSTIC PURCHASED (lbs/yr)

33,000

27,111

 

CAUSTIC PRICE ($/TON) - DRY

375

585

 

CAUSTIC PRICE ($/LB) – WET

0.094

0.146

 

CAUSTIC PURCHASED ($/yr)

$3,094

$3,965

$871

OIL YIELD IMPROVEMENT (%)

 

1.50%

 

YIELD IMPROVEMENT (lbs/yr)

 

15,000

 

YIELD IMPROVEMENT @ $0.28/LB ($/YR)

   

$4,200

       

NET SAVINGS ($/yr)

   

$3,329

 

TEST OBSERVATIONS

 

POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE vs. SODIUM HYDROXIDE

· Easier To Control Separation

o Lower Soaps

o Lower Trace Metals

o Lower Colors

o Lowers Oil Loss

· Heavier/More Fluid Soap

o Less Moisture in Soap

o Soap Easier to Pump

o Centrifuge Easier to Clean

"OPERATORS WANTED TO STAY ON POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE".............

Steve Cooper, Osceola Products